On May 7, India launched ‘Operation Sindoor’, hitting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
The message was loud and clear: After the brutal killing of Indian tourists in Pahalgam, India wouldn’t wait. It would act.
Let’s be clear. This wasn’t just another attack—it was a hate-driven execution.
Tourists were stopped, asked their religion, and shot dead. India didn’t respond with words. It responded with accuracy. Nine strikes. All on verified terror launchpads. Not a single hit on military bases. No civilian homes. No schools. Just terror bunkers.
The world must show zero tolerance for terrorism. #OperationSindoor pic.twitter.com/dmcCLfbMjN
— Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) May 7, 2025
Pakistan’s Old Excuse: Victimhood
Pakistan, as always, cried foul. Claimed that the “civilian infrastructure” was hit. Yet it was supposed to send 35 journalists to the sites—and not one report has surfaced. That says a lot. In the past, Pakistan has not released footage of the supposed attacks it had faced.
Then came the usual line: “We’ve lost 90,000 lives to terror.” Yes, it’s a tragedy. But how many of those lives were lost to the same militants Pakistan once trained, funded, and sheltered?
This isn’t India’s conspiracy theory. It’s Pakistan’s own admission.
Rewind the Tape
- Former Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said openly: “We supported terrorist groups as part of our foreign policy.”
- Former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto added: “Terrorism has been—and was—a part of our strategy.”
These aren’t slips. They’re confessions.
And of course, the world hasn’t forgotten Osama bin Laden—found comfortably living in Abbottabad, right under the nose of Pakistan’s military.
India’s Response: Surgical, Not Emotional
India’s retaliation wasn’t hot-headed. It was strategic. Intelligence shared with allies beforehand. No civilian casualties. Just surgical hits on terror havens.
And yet, Pakistan claimed it shot down two Indian jets. No debris. No video. No radar logs. Just noise.
Pakistan tried to label India as the aggressor. But this wasn’t aggression. It was accountability.
Tarar’s statement that “India is the aggressor” contradicts Pakistan’s own narrative of being a promoter of world peace.
How can a nation that has harbored terror groups and sheltered Osama bin Laden position itself as a champion of peace? It’s a glaring display of duplicity.
When Pakistan continues to support terror factions like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, it becomes impossible to take their claims seriously.
The World Watches
For years, Pakistan painted itself as a peace-loving nation caught in the crossfire. But now, even that story is falling apart. France, Australia, and others backed India’s right to defend itself. The U.S. called India’s action “measured and targeted.”
India isn’t asking for applause. It’s demanding accountability.
Final Thought
Pakistan thought the world would buy another sob story. Instead, it exposed its double game. India didn’t wait. It responded—with facts, not fiction.
This is not about war. It’s about truth.
India is no longer reacting. It’s leading. And this time, it made sure the world saw the difference between the hunter and the hunted. Jai Hind
Also Read UN Security Council Slams Pakistan Over Missiles—India Stands Firm on Peace and Power
