The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has announced a game-changing move: a Funding Restraint Plan aimed at curbing capital access for companies with questionable practices. The plan, though well-intentioned, is creating a stir among credit rating agencies (CRAs)—and not the good kind.
In simple terms, Sebi wants CRAs to go beyond traditional number-crunching and start making moral judgments. Think of it as asking your accountant to double as your therapist—and judge whether you deserve that loan in the first place.
What Does This Mean for You?
At the heart of it, the plan is meant to protect investors. Too many times, companies with dodgy records have raised funds and left shareholders in the dust. Sebi wants to stop that. This isn’t just about checking a balance sheet anymore. It’s about asking:
- Is the company genuinely in need of funds?
- Is the requested amount justified?
- Has it been responsible with past funds?
In theory, this should make the market cleaner and more trustworthy.
But here’s where it gets messy.
Also Read PNB Housing Finance Rises 8.33% After Posting 25% Profit Growth in Q4
The Job No CRA Asked For
CRAs are used to looking at data—debt levels, revenue streams, risk ratios. Sebi now wants them to judge intent and forecast business wisdom. That’s not just new; it’s unprecedented.
These agencies must now assess:
- A company’s business model viability
- Past behavior and track record
- Whether the funding request makes sense
- If the use of funds is justified
The twist? None of this is black-and-white. And making the wrong call can hurt real people—investors.
Also Read CRISIL’s Q4 Numbers Are Strong—But the Strategy Behind Them Is Even Stronger
A New Kind of Risk
Sebi’s Funding Restraint Plan could lead to a cautious market. Rating agencies might start saying “no” more often just to avoid blame. That could stifle innovation, especially for MSMEs (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) that genuinely need capital.
Imagine a promising startup denied funds—not because it’s unworthy, but because a CRA was spooked by the new rules. That’s not just unfortunate; it’s potentially economically damaging.
And if a CRA does greenlight a bad company? The blame game begins. Investors lose, trust erodes, and the regulator gets side-eye.
Balance or Burden?
Sebi says this is about balance. The idea is to create a cleaner market by cutting off bad actors early. In an ideal world, this would boost investor confidence and prevent scandals.
But forcing CRAs into quasi-judicial roles could overextend their mandate. They’re not business strategists, nor are they equipped to divine a company’s future moves. There’s a real risk that this shift might burden the system instead of fixing it.
As financial expert Deepak Shenoy notes, the more subjective ratings get, the harder it becomes to maintain objectivity—and trust.
The Bigger Picture
Sebi’s Funding Restraint Plan is a bold attempt to fix a broken part of India’s financial ecosystem. But implementation will be everything. Without clear frameworks, training, and accountability mechanisms, this could either cleanse the market or paralyze it.
For investors, it could mean safer bets. For companies, it could mean tighter scrutiny. And for CRAs, it means rewriting the rulebook on what their job even is.
Sebi wants to fix the leak before the flood. Whether this bold patch holds—or bursts—depends on how well the system adapts.
Also Read Farm Sector Bank Credit Growth Falls to 10.4% in March, Says RBI…..
