Saturday, 16 Aug 2025
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
Subscribe
Brinks Report
  • Featured
  • Money Matters
  • Business
  • IPL
  • Technology
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • More
    • People
    • World
    • Health and Wellness
    • Horoscope
  • Today’s News
  • 🔥
  • World
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • People
  • Sports
  • India
  • IPL
Font ResizerAa
Brinks ReportBrinks Report
Search
  • Featured
  • Money Matters
  • Business
  • IPL
  • Technology
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • More
    • People
    • World
    • Health and Wellness
    • Horoscope
  • Today’s News
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024-2025 Brinks Report. All content, including text, images, and other media, is copyrighted.
Brinks Report > Blog > Automobile > Tesla Ordered to Pay $243 Million in Fatal Crash Case Linked to Autopilot System
Automobile

Tesla Ordered to Pay $243 Million in Fatal Crash Case Linked to Autopilot System

Ankita Das
Last updated: August 2, 2025 5:09 pm
Ankita Das
Share
Website image 2025 08 02t170547. 228
SHARE
Trulli

A jury in Miami has decided that Tesla must pay $243 million in a case related to a fatal car crash in Florida in 2019. The crash killed a 22-year-old woman named Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured Dillon Angulo.

The jury found that Tesla’s Autopilot feature was partly responsible for the accident. They awarded $200 million in punitive damages and $43 million in compensatory damages to the victims’ families.

Trulli

What Happened in the Crash?

The crash happened when George McGee, the driver of the Tesla, ran through flashing lights, a stop sign, and a T-junction at 62 mph, crashing into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. McGee admitted he was distracted while looking for his dropped phone and believed the Autopilot would warn him or stop the car if needed. He said, “I trusted the technology too much.”

Read more: Cybertruck Is a ‘Dumpster,’ Says Tesla Co-Founder, Slams Musk’s Shift from Affordable EVs

Why Was Tesla Blamed?

The victims’ lawyer, Brett Schreiber, argued that Tesla’s Autopilot system encourages risky behavior, especially since it doesn’t automatically shut off when drivers are distracted. He also pointed out that the road where the crash occurred wasn’t suitable for Autopilot use, yet the system still worked there.

He also criticized Tesla for calling the system “Autopilot”, saying it gives users the wrong impression that the car can drive itself safely without their attention.

Tesla robotaxi california 0 1754095492492 1754095503452

Tesla’s Response

Tesla disagreed with the verdict, calling it “wrong” and saying it could slow down the progress of lifesaving technology. Their lawyer, Joel Smith, said that Tesla clearly tells drivers to stay alert and keep their hands on the wheel. He said the crash was caused by McGee’s distraction and speeding, not the car’s system.

Tesla also said the driver had gone through the same intersection 30 to 40 times before without any issues.

Missing Evidence?

The victims’ lawyers also accused Tesla of hiding or losing important data and video recordings from just before the crash.

Industry Impact

Experts say this case could be a major turning point. Financial analyst Dan Ives said it’s a bad day for Tesla and this big payout might send shockwaves through the car industry.

Car accident lawyer Miguel Custodio added, “This verdict will open the floodgates,” meaning more people might sue Tesla over similar incidents now.

Also See: Volvo India Changes Its Plan: Will Continue Selling Petrol Cars Alongside Electric Vehicles

Conclusion

This is a rare case where Tesla was found legally responsible for a crash involving its Autopilot feature. While Tesla continues to promote self-driving technology, this verdict raises questions about safety, responsibility, and trust in automated systems.

Image Slider
Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
TAGGED:AutopilotVerdictElonmuskEVTesla
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Copy Link Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Joy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Surprise0
Previous Article Website image 2025 08 02t164305. 102 ‘Dhadak 2’ vs ‘Son of Sardaar 2’ Box Office Collection Day 2: Comedy Wins Over Romance
Next Article Website image 2025 08 02t172125. 787 GST Collections Rise 7.5% to ₹1.95 Lakh Crore in July, But Slower Growth and Rising Refunds Spark Concerns
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Brink’s Report delivers fresh, unbiased, and engaging content across politics, business, tech, entertainment, and more. From breaking news to deep dives, we keep you informed—and intrigued—with accurate reporting and diverse perspectives. Explore the world, one story at a time.
FacebookLike
XFollow
RSS FeedFollow
Ad image

You Might Also Like

Japan’s stock market falls as automakers suffer losses due to u. S. Tariffs
AutomobileEconomy

Japan’s Stock Market Falls as Automakers Suffer Losses Due to U.S. Tariffs

By
Ankita Das
Cybertruck
Automobile

The Cybertruck Has Landed in India — But Who’s Brave Enough to Drive It?

By
Dolon Mondal
Bajaj chetak 3503 launch
Automobile

New Bajaj Chetak 3503 Launched in India at Rs. 1.10 Lakh

By
Ankita Das
Copy of image 2025 07 23t122956. 361
AutomobileBusinessWorld

Tesla May Follow China-Style Insurance in India as Data Laws Block Smart Model

By
Dolon Mondal
Ad image

About US


Brink’s Report delivers fresh, unbiased, and engaging content across politics, business, tech, entertainment, and more. From breaking news to deep dives, we keep you informed—and intrigued—with accurate reporting and diverse perspectives. Explore the world, one story at a time.

Top Categories
  • World
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
Usefull Links
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA

© 2024-2025 Brinks Report. All content, including text, images, and other media, is copyrighted.