Daya Singh, President of Gurdwara Singh Sabha in Gurgaon, has taken a bold step by filing a petition in the Supreme Court of India. He is challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, claiming it violates the secular fabric of the Indian Constitution.
This is more than a legal fight—it’s a battle for what secularism truly means in India.
Why Did Daya Singh Step In?
People often ask: Why is a Sikh man leading the charge against a law seen as Islamic?
The answer lies in Daya Singh’s broader vision. As a religious leader, he believes laws must protect everyone equally, not favor one faith over another. He fears the Act gives too much unchecked power to Waqf boards, possibly leading to property disputes involving members of various communities—including Sikhs, Hindus, and others.
The Core Issues in the Petition
Daya Singh’s legal team has outlined several reasons why the 2025 amendment should be struck down:
- Secularism at Risk: The Constitution calls for equal treatment of all religions. The petition argues that the Act, by privileging one community’s institutions, breaks this balance.
- Encroachment of Property: Critics believe the amendment lets Waqf boards claim land or buildings without proper verification. This has already caused legal tussles across India.
- Lack of Transparency: Another issue raised is the absence of due process. Once a property is listed as Waqf, it becomes hard for individuals to contest or reclaim it—even if they have valid ownership documents.
For an example of how property laws can clash with heritage and ownership rights, India has seen similar issues under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
Also Read Is the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 a Threat to Religious Freedom? Supreme Court to Decide
What Makes This Case Unique?
It’s not just about Daya Singh or the Sikh community. This is about all Indians, regardless of religion. If the state starts favoring one religious group in law, it could lead to greater division and discrimination.
His petition seeks to ensure equal justice—a principle every Indian should support.
What’s at Stake?
The Supreme Court’s ruling could:
- Redefine how religious property is handled in India.
- Set limits on the powers of Waqf boards.
- Clarify the state’s role in religious matters in a secular democracy.
In short, the decision could change how India balances faith, freedom, and fairness.
The Road Ahead
The case is now in the hands of the Supreme Court. Legal experts, community leaders, and citizens alike are watching closely. Whatever the outcome, the petition by Daya Singh has already reignited an important national conversation about secularism, property rights, and religious equality.
Also read ‘We Won’t Allow It’: Mamata Blocks Waqf Act as Protests Turn Violent in Bengal
