[Ruby_E_Template slug="buzzstream-header"]
Font ResizerAa
Brinks ReportBrinks Report
Search
  • Featured
  • Money Matters
  • Business
  • IPL
  • Technology
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • More
    • People
    • World
    • Health and Wellness
    • Horoscope
  • Today’s News
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024-2025 Brinks Report. All content, including text, images, and other media, is copyrighted.
Society

Supreme Court Questions Allahabad HC’s Ruling on Attempted Rape Case!

Ankita Das
Last updated: March 26, 2025 8:48 am
Ankita Das
SC Questions Allahabad HC Order on Attempt to Rape Case

The Supreme Court of India has taken notice of a controversial decision made by the Allahabad High Court regarding an attempted rape case. The top court will hear the matter on March 26, 2025.

On March 17, the Allahabad High Court ruled that forcibly grabbing the breasts of an 11-year-old girl and breaking the string of her pyjama were not enough to prove an attempt to commit rape. The court stated that these actions did not clearly show that the accused were determined to commit the crime.

Also Read: Supreme Court Acts After Cash Found in Judge’s Home – Corruption in the Judiciary?

A bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai has now taken suo motu (on its own) cognisance of this judgment, after another Supreme Court bench refused to accept a petition challenging it.

Charges Reduced

Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, who gave the March 17 ruling, reviewed the case and concluded that the accused should not be charged with attempted rape under IPC Section 376 (rape) and Section 511 (attempt to commit an offence punishable with life imprisonment). He also excluded Section 18 of the POCSO Act, which punishes attempts to commit sexual crimes against children.

Instead, the court reduced the charges to Section 354(b) of the IPC, which deals with assaulting a woman with the intent to undress her, and Section 9 of the POCSO Act, which punishes aggravated sexual assault on minors.

The Supreme Court’s decision to review the case could lead to changes in how such crimes are interpreted under the law.

TAGGED:AllahabadHCChildProtectionJusticeForSurvivorsLegalNewsPOCSOSupremeCourt
Previous Article Kunal Kamra Row: Yogi Adityanath on Freedom of Expression Kunal Kamra Controversy: Yogi Adityanath Says Freedom of Expression Should Not Be Used for Personal Attacks
Next Article Mohanlal’s L2: Empuraan and Salman Khan’s Sikandar Set for a Big Eid Weekend Clash Biggest Box Office Battle of 2025! L2: Empuraan vs. Sikandar— Who Will Rule in this Eid?
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

Hyderabad Charminar fire tragedy
SocietyWorld

17 Lives Lost, Including 8 Innocent Children, in Devastating Fire Near Hyderabad’s Charminar

By Ankita Das
FestivalSociety

Rath Yatra 2025: Over 500 Devotees Injured in Puri During Chariot Pulling of Lord Balabhadra

By Ankita Das
SocietyTechnology

New Tatkal Ticket Booking Rule from July 1, 2025: Aadhaar Must Be Linked with IRCTC Account

By Ankita Das
CrimeSociety

“He Just Wanted to Play in the Rain” – Delhi Boy’s Innocent Plea Ends in Unthinkable Tragedy…

By Ankita Das
[Ruby_E_Template slug="buzzstream-footer"]